Quantcast The Rotunda
College Media Network

The Rotunda

LoginRegister

Hollywood = Anti-Paparazzi?

Courtney Jones

Issue date: 11/4/09 Section: Entertainment
  • Print
  • Email

The celebrities of Hollywood have just won a major battle in the war with the paparazzi. I guess it helps to have a mega-movie star such as Arnold Schwarzenegger get voted into office as governor of California. The governator just signed an anti-paparazzi law that allows civil lawsuits against media outlets that commission or publish photographs. The most important part of the law is an amendment on the decade old Anti-Paparazzi Act that was a response to Princess Diana's death due to aggressive paparazzi. The new law comes as Los Angeles authorities try to crack down on aggressive photographers following a series of altercations involving actresses and actors especially. The law is set to take effect in January 2010. But what about the ethics of the situation?

The California measure states that the rights of a free press "to report details of an individual's private life must be weighed against the rights of the individual to enjoy liberty and privacy." The measure amends an existing California state law that makes photographers subject to legal action if they trespass on private property or photograph someone who has a "reasonable expectation of privacy."

The new fine for unauthorized clicking? 50,000. Dozens and dozens of photographers dedicate their whole lives to getting the perfect picture of a celebrity. They are not exactly a well-liked a group among the famous. Celebrity photos can be big business, especially when it comes to major milestones-marriages, children, scandals. They make or break a career for a celebrity, and make or break a career for a photographer. Eva Longoria and Tony Parker received $2 million from OK for photos of their lavish Paris, France, wedding. People magazine reportedly paid $14 million for the first pictures of the Brad Pitt-Angelina Jolie twins. The public that consumes these photos is not innocent either. One reason why this industry is so profitable is because so many people go out and buy these tabloids and keep an eye on what certain celebrities are doing.

Paparazzi have earned their aggressive reputation worldwide. Some block cars so celebrities have trouble arriving to or leaving a scene. Others hit cars and cause an accident just so they can get photos. They don't care about their welfare, or the welfare of the people whose photographs they are trying to obtain. Governator Schwarzenegger himself had several run-ins with the paparazzi where his life was endangered. He and his wife were once run off the road by paparazzi trying to take their pictures, and the governor has been surrounded by paparazzi while trying to pick up his kids from school.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 1 of 1

Alexander P.

posted 11/04/09 @ 11:57 PM EST

Paparazzi have always been on the low end of the photographer's hierarchy, and I must say that photography is relevant to my interests. I think that enough reasons are at hand to show the benefits of this law, and how it can put limits on privacy invading individuals, who provide the fodder to make so much fuss, over some little image. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What are you doing for spring break?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement