Hollywood = Anti-Paparazzi?
Courtney Jones
Issue date: 11/4/09 Section: Entertainment
|
The California measure states that the rights of a free press "to report details of an individual's private life must be weighed against the rights of the individual to enjoy liberty and privacy." The measure amends an existing California state law that makes photographers subject to legal action if they trespass on private property or photograph someone who has a "reasonable expectation of privacy."
The new fine for unauthorized clicking? 50,000. Dozens and dozens of photographers dedicate their whole lives to getting the perfect picture of a celebrity. They are not exactly a well-liked a group among the famous. Celebrity photos can be big business, especially when it comes to major milestones-marriages, children, scandals. They make or break a career for a celebrity, and make or break a career for a photographer. Eva Longoria and Tony Parker received $2 million from OK for photos of their lavish Paris, France, wedding. People magazine reportedly paid $14 million for the first pictures of the Brad Pitt-Angelina Jolie twins. The public that consumes these photos is not innocent either. One reason why this industry is so profitable is because so many people go out and buy these tabloids and keep an eye on what certain celebrities are doing.
Paparazzi have earned their aggressive reputation worldwide. Some block cars so celebrities have trouble arriving to or leaving a scene. Others hit cars and cause an accident just so they can get photos. They don't care about their welfare, or the welfare of the people whose photographs they are trying to obtain. Governator Schwarzenegger himself had several run-ins with the paparazzi where his life was endangered. He and his wife were once run off the road by paparazzi trying to take their pictures, and the governor has been surrounded by paparazzi while trying to pick up his kids from school.


Viewing Comments 1 - 1 of 1
Alexander P.
posted 11/04/09 @ 11:57 PM EST
Paparazzi have always been on the low end of the photographer's hierarchy, and I must say that photography is relevant to my interests. I think that enough reasons are at hand to show the benefits of this law, and how it can put limits on privacy invading individuals, who provide the fodder to make so much fuss, over some little image. (Continued…)
Post a Comment